“The
challenge for India with China is not to
compete for trade and economic growth,
but to compete for strategic space”.1
Abstract
The People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) adventurism in Ladakh has been a blessing in disguise in expediting India’s war-preparedness and shifting the focus towards sharpening our own forces, and their response against China from strategic to tactical levels. Though Indian Army (IA) is a seasoned soldiers’ army, it yet needs to match steps with modern technology while also focusing on the upgradation of its strategies, policies, and tactics. The need of the hour is thus, to focus on enhancing situational awareness, improving operational strategies, tactics and grouping capabilities, exploiting the field of human resource through effective training of troops, and, most importantly, focusing holistically on strengthening the administrative and logistic set-up to sustain in rough, rugged terrains, have effective border-area infrastructures, state of the art medical facilities for troops well within their reach as China specialises in the game of attrition. India is committed to a strategy of deterrence against China and to achieve this deterrence IA needs to identify the challenges at various levels vis-à-vis the PLA and, thus, formalise a response system to fortify IA’s position against PLA. This article sheds light on the challenges faced by the IA in relation to the PLA and the measures to mitigate the shortcomings and fortifying IA’s response against the PLA, limited to tactical level only.
Introduction
From ‘Hindi-Chini Bhai-Bhai’ to ‘Hindi-Chini Bye-Bye’, India- China relations have been marked with ambiguity. Amidst series of intermittent scuffles owing to China’s ‘salami slicing’2 tactics in the state of Arunachal Pradesh and Union Territory of Ladakh to full-fledged action in Galwan since May 2020, China today stands as India’s primary adversary.
While rumours
are rife that Chinese aggressive activities in Ladakh are a ruse to divert
India’s attention from Indian Ocean Region (IOR) to its Northern borders, the
ongoing dispute definitely highlights several inadequacies. The expeditious
deployment of troops in the hot bed, necessity-based emergency equipment
procurement, and sudden move of several formations to LAC, can all be summed up
in one phrase- ‘knee-jerk reaction’. The present stand-off is, thus, an eye-opener
for all stakeholders to cover lost ground and fortify India’s defence forces in
a holistic manner through effective policy creation and implementation.
Apropos, Indian Army (IA) needs to modernise itself by not just inducting
state-of-the-art weapons but also by reorganising its existing tactical
formations and fighting units, modernising its administrative and logistic
set-up and training methods.
PLA Revolution over the past Decades
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has consistently transformed from a
manpower-intensive army to a force-multiplier entity today. The Chinese have
long erased the trauma
faced at the hands of Vietnam in 1979, and today stand
tall as a world-class military. The ruthless implementation of merit-based
policies, large-scale Research and Development (R&D) programmes, and
indigenous defence industrial base have invigorated and modernised the PLA
through ‘mechanisation’ and ‘informationisation’.3 Post the latest reforms in 2020, PLA now comprises of the following arms:
n PLA Army.
n PLA Navy.
n PLA Air Force.
n PLA Rocket Force.
n PLA Strategic
Support Force.
n PLA Joint
Logistic Support Force.
With its
strategic policy of ‘Active Defence’, PLA has now been organised into five
Theatre Commands, to focus on operations with integrated jointness, as under:
n Eastern
Theatre. Responsible towards Taiwan and the East China Sea.
n Southern
Theatre. Responsible towards South China Sea, South East Asian border
security and territorial and maritime disputes.
n Western
Theatre. Responsible for conflict-resolution, with primary focus on India.
It includes the military districts of Xinjiang and Tibet and focuses on
‘Counter-Terrorism’ operations along China’s Western borders.
n Northern
Theatre. Responsible towards Korean Peninsula and Russian borders.
n Central
Theatre. Primarily responsible for the
defence of Beijing as also to provide support to the other four theatres.
Figure 1 : China’s Theatre Commands
Source: Military and Security Developments
Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2020, Annual Report to Congress,
Office of the Secretary of Defence, 2020.4
Figure 2 : Force Structurewithin
China’s Western Theatre
Source: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2020, Annual Report to Congress, Office of the Secretary of Defence, 2020.5j
Challenges Ahead of IA
IA is a professional army,
with battle-hardened soldiers. However, amidst the race for modernisation,
induction of ultra-sophisticated equipment worldwide, and changing character of
warfare, numerous challenges are staring in the face of IA today, highlighted
in the Land Warfare Doctrine 2018 of the IA, and are enumerated as under:
n ‘Two and a half
front’6 war in wake of collusive
threat from China and Pakistan, in addition to non-conventional
counter-insurgency warfare in Kashmir.
n Ambiguity of
operations with nations neither at peace nor at war, or in ‘Grey Zones’, with
expansion of domains of warfare from conventional to cyber/space/non-contact
warfare.
n Limited defence
budget allotment vis-à-vis ambitious modernisation plan.
n Exploring
combined options of diplomatic, political, military and economic responses to
avoid future confrontation.
It is, thus,
imperative for the IA to re-align its policies and strategies from strategic to
tactical levels, to strengthen itself against the PLA, by inducting modern
weaponry, enhancing advanced professional training of personnel, tailor-made
administrative and logistic support, improving connectivity channels,
expeditious technical upgradation, self-sustenance and refining existing
tactical procedures to adopt fresh tactics, tailor-made for tackling the PLA.
Moreover, two
colluding belligerents require focused and speedy formulation of response
mechanisms, with perspective plans, increased budgetary support, and induction
of modern weaponry. IA should understand that PLA respects strength and to this
end, its own response systems need to evoke adequate caution in the minds of
local PLA commanders, lest they plan any adventurism. Simultaneously, the
organisational structure and equipment prowess must aid in fortifying the
theatre of response, to ensure inter-theatre operability.
n Battalion Level
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) will always remain quintessential despite any leap in technology yet, it may be suitably backed-up with modern technologies, like Raytheon’s FoXTEN7 (an open intelligence platform being used by US Army).
The surveillance devices
presently available with a Battalion Commander offer very limited verticals for
intelligence gathering. Thus, procuring additional surveillance devices like
passive Battle Field Surveillance Radars, short-range surveillance drones, increasing
the number of quadcopters,
increasing the scaling of surveillance equipment like night-vision devices, Passive Night Vision Goggles
and devices, Hand Held Thermal Imagers, provision of Pan-Tilt-Zoom cameras
etc., will greatly accentuate intelligence-collection capabilities at battalion
level.
Focus on unmanned/remote-intelligence collection methods and devices like Drones, Micro-UAVs, Long-Range Reconnaissance and Observation System (LORROS), high-tech sensors, etc..
n Brigade Level
Inducting components of Electronic Warfare (EW) and Information Warfare
(IW) in brigades.
Making
Brigade Headquarter the first stage agency for effective intelligence analysis
and collation, by sieving out non-essential information, and passing the rest
to next higher level.
Shortening the gap between
requisitioning of satellite imagery and its receipt to 24 hrs or less in both
peace and hostilities, for better reaction time.
n Division Level
Achieving synergy between other
intelligence agencies at the division level, like Central Armed Police Forces
(CAPF), local police and various agencies of the Ministry of Home Affairs for
holistic information collection and collation.
Creation of a separate branch
on the lines of Joint Operations Centre (JOC) at division level for
intelligence collection, collation, analysis, segregation, dissemination and
action.
Procurement of ‘Big Data Analysis’ software like Memex8, RapidMiner, coupled with Artificial Intelligence (AI) for enhanced surveillance and effective processing of gathered intelligence for gaining upper-hand in Non-Contact Warfare.