|
Introduction
Computers and internet are invading business, government,national
defence and in fact, most aspects of our daily life at break-neck
speed. More than one billion people in the world have access to the
internet, with a quarter of them with broadband. All these activities
now rely on an interdependent network of information technology
infrastructures called cyber-space. In the past few years, threats in
cyber-space have risen dramatically. Securing cyber-space is an
extraordinarily difficult strategic challenge that requires a
coordinated and focused effort from our entire society – the central
government, state and local governments, the private sector, and the
people.
A significant amount of our personal information is getting stored
either on our own computers or on someone else’s system; it may be our
income and expenditure details, shopping and credit card records,
banking transactions, taxation and other liabilities, and all that
information we may not want to make public. Cyber-space security
includes protecting personal and classified information by preventing
and detecting misuse. For national level defence and security matters,
it involves detecting, responding and preempting or counteracting
cyber attacks.
It is important to recognise and emphasise the related risks and to
familiarise with some of the terminologies and international level of
concerns and efforts to manage the situation.
Cyber-Space as the new theatre for war and conflict
Until 1980s, Space was defined as a new battlefield after Land, Sea
and Air, the ‘Final Frontier’; when related supremacy was defined in
terms of technologies to build and launch missiles and satellite
launch vehicles, to defend against ‘star-war’ type of attacks, and to
be able to use and control Space for specific and economic benefits.
In fact the relevance of Space activities for India was aptly
enunciated by Dr Vikram A Sarabhai: "We are convinced that if we have
to play a meaningful role nationally, and in the community of nations,
we must be second to none in the application of advanced technologies
to the real problems of man and society, which we find in our
country."
In the 1990s, information superiority started becoming more important
than Space supremacy; concepts of knowledge worker, knowledge industry
and knowledge power emerged. Indian computer and software engineers
made name for themselves in the international information technology
scene, and they contributed to the US and several other countries
becoming information giants. India, Indians and Indian web sites,
however, are left behind in information generation and supply; there
is hardly any Indian on-line-content or information that one may like
to download by paying for it. This handicap becomes more pronounced
when we want to enter cyber-space for real-life transactions with
government agencies, utilities and day to day affairs; notable
exceptions being private sector banking and credit card institutions,
airlines, and now railways.
It is not just supremacy of cyber-space that is the present issue; the
race now is to own cyber-space in such a way that one is assured of
all ring-side seats, making all others sit in the back-benches. It is
now clear that cyber-space will add a fifth dimension to Land, Sea,
Air and Space as a theatre for war and conflict. Only the fastest and
the fittest may survive – there is no place for the second best. In
the cyber-space, there is no concept of winner and loser; karo ya maro
has to be the goal.
Definition of Cyber-Space
Cyber-Space is very aptly defined in the February 2003 US Government
document entitled The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace.
Cyberspace is the nervous system of nation’s critical infrastructures
and is composed of hundreds of thousands of interconnected computers,
servers, routers, switches, and fiber optic cables. A nation’s
critical infrastructures are composed of public and private
institutions in the sectors of agriculture, food, water, public
health, emergency services, government, defence industrial base,
energy, information and telecommunications, transportation, banking
and finance, chemicals and hazardous materials, postal and shipping.
It may be noted that subjects and words such as Strategic, Space,
Defence, Nuclear, Police, Security, Paramilitary, etc. are not
specifically mentioned.
This document further emphasises that securing cyberspace is a
difficult strategic challenge that requires coordinated and focused
effort from the entire society – the federal government, state and
local governments, the private sector, and the people. In fact, it
considers private sector as best equipped and structured to respond to
an evolving cyber threat. There are specific instances, however, where
the federal government's response is most appropriate and justified –
ensuring the safety of its own cyber infrastructure – or where high
transaction costs or legal barriers lead to significant coordination
problems.
The US strategy to secure cyberspace articulates five national
priorities:-
| (a) |
A National Cyberspace Security Response
System. |
| (b) |
A National Cyberspace security Threat and
Vulnerability Reduction Programme. |
| (c) |
A National Cyberspace Security
Awareness and Training Programme. |
| (d) |
Securing Government's Cyberspace. |
| (e) |
National Security and International Cyberspace Security
Cooperation. |
The strategy to secure cyberspace is part of an overall effort to
protect the US as a nation. It is an implementing component of the
‘National Strategy for Homeland Security’ and is complemented by
‘National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical
Infrastructures and Key Assets’.
The US has also created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on
25 November 2002 to unite 22 federal entities for improving homeland
security and to develop a comprehensive national plan for securing key
resources and critical infrastructure. DHS is required to be organised
as a centre of excellence for cyber-security, to provide technical
assistance to the private sector and government entities for emergency
recovery plans, and to provide warnings and advice about protective
and counter measures. It will also perform and fund research and
development, along with other agencies that will lead to new
scientific understanding and technologies.
The Law of Cyber-Space
The UN Institute of Training and Research brought out a document
titled ‘The Law of Cyber-Space’ in October 2005 which emphasised
concern about absence of globally harmonised legislation turning
cyber-space into an area of ever increasing dangers and worries. In
many ways, the present situation is similar to the problems faced in
dealing with the high seas, when there was no consensus legislation.
The international community finally woke up to the challenge, and
started negotiations on the Law of the Sea; which took almost a decade
to finalise. In the case of cyber-space, the challenge is far greater
than high seas; the speed of change is phenomenal, the dangers affect
all countries without exception, new shoals and icebergs appear every
day, and global responses are sporadic or non-existent. There can be
no doubt whatsoever that a globally negotiated and comprehensive Law
of Cyber-Space is essential.
The Information Technology Act 2000
The IT Act, 2000 received the assent of the President of India on 09
June 2000. It provides legal recognition for transactions carried out
by means of electronic data interchange and other means of electronic
communication, commonly referred to as “electronic commerce”. It also
provides alternatives to paper-based methods of communication and
storage of information and will facilitate electronic filing of
documents with the government agencies. The act defines the concepts
and purpose of Digital Signatures, Certifying Authority,, maintenance
of Electronic Records, penalties and adjudication for unauthorised
access and damage to computer systems, Cyber Appellate Tribunal,
liabilities of Network Service Providers, constitution of Cyber
Regulations Advisory Committee, and such. For cyber security matters,
it empowers a DSP to search and arrest without warrant any one
suspected of having committed or about to commit any cyber offence.
UN declares 17 May as the World Information Society Day
On 17 May 2006, UN declared that henceforth the World
Telecommunication Day would be known as the World Information Society
Day. On this occasion, Kofi Annan stated, thus : "In an increasingly
interconnected and networked world, it has become critically important
to safeguard our vital systems and infrastructures against attack by
cyber criminals, while instilling confidence in online transactions in
order to promote trade, commerce, banking, telemedicine, e-government
and a host of other e-applications". There is a need to develop a
global culture of cyber security, which is especially important for
developing countries. In the Institution of Engineers (IE) seminar on
‘Promoting Global Cyber Security’, the Minister of State for Defence,
Shri MM Pallamraju stressed for an India-centric ‘national cyber
security response system’ to deal with threats in cyber-space and from
global cyber terrorism.
Information Superiority and Cyber Warfare
Information Technology is a double edged weapon. It provides vast
opportunities but simultaneously introduces new vulnerabilities and
threats, which may arise through computers, content and connectivity
or, to put it differently, hardware, software, information and
networks.
Information superiority over our adversaries (including militant and
terrorist outfits) is very essential. Non-lethal information weapons
can black out communication systems, destroy valuable data and cripple
the nation. therefore, we have to act faster than any adversary. This
requires defensive as well as offensive cyber warfare capabilities.
Cyber warfare can be a full fledged war and vital infrastructure shall
get targeted. To handle cyber wars, highest national level decision
making is required, in real time and with full fall-back options. For
this purpose, basic building blocks include: excellent monitoring
tools for network traffic, web sites and databases; intrusion
detection, firewalls, encryption and decryption algorithms, public key
infrastructure and remote access facilities.
Offensive cyber warfare spans computer crimes and information
terrorism. Everyone is under threat – telephone, power supply, banks,
transport, the day to day needs. It is important to create tools,
awareness, and structures to assess threats to information resources,
including military and economic espionage, computer break-ins,
denial-of-service, destruction and modification of data, distortion of
information, forgery, control and disruption of information flow,
electronic bombs, etc. In essence, the thrust of the initiatives must
lead to information assurance like Life Assurance.
Cyber weapons have a range of inter-continental ballistic missiles
(ICBMs), speed of high power laser and lethality of both (almost like
Brahmastra). they are more devastating than nuclear weapons or other
weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), are difficult to detect and defend
against and are of virtually no cost. It is impossible to limit their
battle space, because they are borderless. They do not require any
specially trained military organisation, and, hence, any one can
master them with minimum effort. Therefore, we should not
underestimate the potential of an adversary to build, deploy and use
cyber weapons.
Cyber Warfare Ethics
The basic principle of international law relating to military
operations and wars prohibits attacking civilians and non-combatant
immunity is to be ensured. But in the cyber-space, it is not possible
to differentiate between civilians and military personnel. Also, the
concept of just war theory states that war should not be initiated by
individuals; it must be a collective decision by a known body or a
government. But cyber attacks can be easily initiated and managed by
motivated individuals. Aggression has to be measured against necessity
and proportionality; it cannot be for fun by misguided criminals. It
has to be the last resort and should do more good than harm.
‘Everything is fair in love and war,’ they say. But in the arena of
cyber-space, unless otherwise established, nothing is fair in cyber
games or cyber wars. Some are even shamelessly fighting for
registering .xxx domain!
Cyber Wild West
While justifying creation of global cyber laws, the document 'The law
of CyberSpace’, of the UN Institute of Training and Research has
emphasised that Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) damage through
internet connected computers has reached $25 to $30 billion per year.
Spam now accounts for 45 per cent of all e-mails, or 15 billion
messages every day; the world wide cost to business stands at a
staggering total of $20 billion a year in lost productivity and
technology expenses. At the projected rate of growth, the number of
daily spam messages will rise to more than 50 billion by 2007, with
costs touching almost $200 billion per year. In a recent survey on
e-commerce, it has been noted that 64 per cent decided against
purchasing online out of fear. Average losses reported by firms as a
result of internet attacks represent about 60 per cent of all other
losses. About 40 per cent of firms receive as many as 100 attacks a
month, and 80 per cent of these are high magnitude virus and denial of
service attacks.
The web site of America’s Network reported on 26 March 2006 about an
international ‘Internet Fraud Crackdown’ in the same month. Because of
mass-marketing through internet such as bogus lottery, prize and
sweepstakes offerings; offers of nonexistent investments; fake offers
of ‘pre-approved’ credit cards or credit-card protection; and tax
fraud schemes, more than 2.8 million people, mainly elderly citizens,
fell victim to the scams, suffering losses totalling more than $ one
billion. A statement from the US Justice Department said that in the
US, 139 suspects were arrested, with an additional 426 arrests in
Canada, Costa Rica, the Netherlands and Spain as well as Nigeria,
Britain and New Zealand.
The web site of Enterprise Innovation, reported on 25 November 2005
the Gartner survey on banking consumers: 40 million Americans think
they have received a phishing email during past six months. Cyber
criminals using fake emails and web sites to steal account and
identity information from consumers is called phishing. Banks are
nervous. Of the 1.8 million consumers who recall giving away
confidential information such as user ID, password, or credit card
number, over half had some form of identity theft related fraud –
costing banks and card companies about $1.2 billion in direct losses.
It is important for banks to work on stronger methods to authenticate
themselves to their customers and their customers to them. They have
to resort to shared secrets, trusted third party authentication of
users and service providers, and also take help from third-party black
lists.
While noting these statistics with concern, we must proceed with
caution. controls and censorship should not sacrifice the benefits of
IT as a tool for economic and social progress; respect for privacy,
anonymity and freedom of expression are also important.
Terminology of Cyber Attacks
Virus. A piece of code or code fragment – replicates itself
when host programme begins to run – erases data, software programme,
or memory – to interrupt the action of the computer it infects.
Worm (Turbo Worm). Not just a code but an entire programme –
replicates itself even without execution of any other programme – eats
up computer resources and/or deletes data – cripples the computer.
Trojan Horse. A programme or code inside a programme – performs
a task on the outside, while unleashing a virus or a worm on the
inside – can perform information retrieval, without leaving a trace.
Logic Bomb. May release a virus or a worm or perform some other
secret task – usually planted by the system developer.
Trap Door. Similar to logic bomb – a secret way back in to the
system, left by the designer as a security flaw.
Chipping. For doing the above to the hardware instead of the
software – can be a circuitry in a chip.
Enemies of Internet freedom
America’s Network on 3 May 2006, has argued that Asian governments are
worst enemies of Internet freedom. They censor web sites and jail
people who express odd views online. China, Vietnam and Nepal are
feeling more threatened by cyberspace than ever as internet use booms
and people seek information. Of the 15 'Enemies of the Internet' named
by Paris-based right group, seven are in Asia. These include china,
North Korea, Vietnam and Myanmar. Because of this attitude, Asian
societies are at risk of seeing more corruption and abuse of
government power. public discontent would also grow, leading to social
instability. Politically backward countries are afraid of the
internet; they fear this will spread ideas of freedom and democracy.
The report has emphasised that using sophisticated filtering
technology, forcing Internet cafès to register users and service
providers to reveal user information, the governments were trying to
control modernisation.
google.com blocked in China was a headline in the Times of India of 8
June 2006. Similarly, "authorities shut down Chinese search engines"
was a headline in Telecom Asia of 21 June 2006. Of course, the
censored Chinese-language version, google.cn was still available.
launched in January 2006 amid controversy because Google agreed to
censor its service according to the wishes of China’s propaganda
chief. Chinese blocking was being gradually extended to Google News
and Google Mail. Search engines at Sina.com and Sohu.com have been
shut down since 19 June 2006.
Cyber Security Measures
Real hard core cyber security work is essential – Firewall is not at
all a sufficient measure. We should not demonstrate any false sense of
security. Knowledge of Internet Browser and some surfing does not make
one expert in e-governance - nor is a password a real security
measure. Most employees are expected to create, use and manage
information - but a common mistake is to rely on IT departments
instead of building information literacy throughout the organisation.
Many organisations are relying on IT departments to manage security
and to protect information, particularly sensitive and proprietary
data.
It is essential to quickly move away from Newbies (who are beginners
and use downloaded tools for capturing passwords sniffed from
unsecured channels and cracking a few locks) and Script Kiddies (who
are endowed with basic programming skills and use these to customise
the downloaded tools) to Coders (who have advanced programming skills
and write codes that are used on the Internet) and onward to
Professionals and Spooks (who possess advanced skills and are capable
of functioning as real Cyber Warriors).
It is true that for most, enterprises security and cyber security are
not part of core competencies. Also good security staff are difficult
to find and hard to keep. Therefore, it has become essential to
outsource protection. Common services that can be outsourced include
straightforward offerings such as managed email and virus protection.
More complex arrangements include risk management and managed Public
Key Infrastructure (PKI).
Recently, the concept of Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP) has
emerged. According to the US-based Computer Emergency Response Team
(CERT) Coordination Center, MSSP is a recommended option for network
boundary protection, including management of firewalls, intrusion
detection, security monitoring, risk and vulnerability assessments and
penetration testing; incident management, including emergency response
and forensic analysis; anti-virus and content filtering and on-site
consulting; and data archiving and restoration.
The then Principal Scientific Adviser, Dr APJ Abdul Kalam took
initiative to organise the Society for Electronic Transactions and
Security (SETS), which was registered on 22 May 2002. The objective of
SETS is to develop technologies and products for protection,
surveillance and monitoring and certification in the area of
Information Security, to tender advice to the Government on policy
formulation and act as a buffer between sensitive user agencies and
corporate houses for developing security solutions, to provide
consultancy services to governments, banks and other public and
private sector institutions to safeguard the information and knowledge
generation resources of the country.
Electronic Warfare and Cyber Security
Cyber security, information warfare and electronic warfare are very
closely related – all have the three basic constituents: Monitoring,
Defensive and Offensive Operations.
ESM (Electronic Support Measures) includes interception, decryption,
direction finding, fingerprinting – if the text can not be decoded,
even data such as time, regularity, location of source of
communication is important.
ECM (Electronic Counter Measures) includes jammers – CW, Impulse,
broadband, chirp – to disrupt or deny – create nuisance and force
adversaries to use alternative and expensive means.
ECCM (Electronic Counter Counter Measures) takes care of adversary’s
attempts to jam us – may use frequency hopping, spread spectrum,
decoys, etc.
Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In)
CERT-In is managed by the Department of Information Technology (DIT)
Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. It is likely to
become the nation’s most trusted referral agency for responding to
computer security incidents as and when they occur. It will also
assist in implementing proactive measures to reduce the risks of
computer security incidents and shall enhance the security of India’s
communications and information infrastructure through proactive action
and effective collaboration. CERT-In has also performed statistical
analysis of defaced Indian websites (country code top level domains -
ccTLDs.in) and found 667 defacements during 19982004 in 6430
registered domains (1998-1, 1999-4, 2000-75, 2001-219, 2002-121,
2003131, 2004-116).
Army also launched a ‘Computer Emergency Response Team’ (CERT) website
on 14 October 2005 to improve on cyber security and to act as a nodal
agency to address Army's cyber security concerns and to protect Army's
'Information Assets'. On
24 February 2006, President Dr APJ Abdul Kalam, while inaugurating and
dedicating Army Wide Area Network (AWAN) covering 174 signal centres
for messaging services, directory services along with Voice Over
Internet Protocol (VoIP), etc. suggested that it may encompass the
entire defence services and the inter-linkages with other Departments
of the Government of India, particularly those dealing with national
security matters and related decision making process. He emphasised
the importance of management of internal threats and creation of
on-line information content: resources, imageries, previous war
experiences, war gaming models, maps, terrain information, support
infrastructure, policy documents, decision trees, protocols and
databases.
Control of Internet
Like the US control of the GPS, people are worried about Control of
Internet. On 10 October 2005, a meeting was held in Geneva in
preparation for the World Summit on the Information Society, in Tunis.
Many countries of the world have lined up against the US retaining
control over the management of internet, which is currently the
responsibility of ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers) under the authority of the US Department of Commerce. EU and
UN sponsored WGIG (Working Group on Internet Governance) have
recommended governance by International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
Concluding Remarks
The telecommunication revolution brought in the concept of ‘death of
the distance’. earlier, satellite broadcasting introduced a similar
phrase ‘global village’, now cyber-space has created the ‘universal
desktop’. The entire world is at our finger tips, we have to just
stretch our hand to click and open windows to the entire universe.
While the potential and opportunities are endless, risks have
increased. We are under continuous attack, from viruses and worms,
from cyber criminals and cyber missiles and we may find ourselves in
the open, defenceless.
Data traffic will soon exceed voice traffic, so much so that voice and
data would merge to such an extent that independent reference to voice
as a communication mode may not be relevant. This will make secure
communications more difficult to realise. Also, Internet, with ever
increasing reach and decreasing cost, may become the only surviving
medium of communications in the future. It is no longer a question of
whether Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) will wipe out traditional
telephony, but a question of how quickly it will do so.
Digital divide and brain drains are creations of negative minds. Our
objective should be to build digital bridges or digital highways and
create, brain gains. ITU’s Digital Access Index – measuring the
availability of advanced telecommunication and computing technologies
– places South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong in the top ten ahead of
Canada, the US and the UK. Four of the top ten broadband economies are
in Asia – in South Korea 79 per cent of households are connected; Hong
Kong 74 per cent, Taiwan 60 per cent and Singapore 59 per cent. India
lags behind with just one per cent households connected. The silver
lining is that the internationalisation of International
Telecommunication Union (ICT) has made English less of an advantage,
unlike in the past.
Software in local language and mother tongue may soon start giving
significant advantage and extra competence, which we should exploit.
That is the only way we can involve a large part of our population to
solve cyber-space security problems and survive in the race to save
ourselves. Unfortunately, there is no 100 per cent guarantee that even
with the best precautions some of the bad things won’t happen, but
there are steps one can take to minimise the chances of harmful
intrusions and their damage potentials. For survival, there is no
alternative to quick and specific protective and proactive actions, at
individual and national levels.
References
| 1 |
Ved Prakash Sandlas, "Defence Space Options",
Journal of United Service Institution of India, Vol. CXXXV,
No.561, (July-September 2005). |
| 2 |
‘The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace’,
the White House, Washington, USA, February 2003. |
| 3 |
Ahmad Kamal, ‘The Law of Cyber Space’, United
Nations Institute of Training and Research, October 2005. |
| 4 |
The Information Technology Act, 2000’, The
Gazette of India, 9 June 2000. |
| 5 |
"World Broadband Statistics: Q4 2005", Point
Topics (March 2006). |
| 6 |
Fundamental Principles of Network Security’,
Christopher Leidigh, American Power Conversion (APC), 2005. |
| 7 |
‘Analysis of Defaced Indian Websites under in’,
S Chakrabarty and B Saha, Department of Information Technology,
Government of India, 2004. |
| 8 |
www.presidentofindia.nic.in, address at the
inauguration of the AWAN, Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi, 24 February
2006. |
| 9 |
www.cert-in.org.in |
| 10 |
www.us-cert.gov |
| 11 |
www.telecomasia.net |
| 12 |
www.americasnetwork.com |
|