|
C ommon historical, linguistic
and cultural Turkish ties with Central Asian countries have served as
a valuable foundation for the development of close relations. Turkish
engagement with the region over the past decade, while western
attention was lacking, has proved to be vital in many respects. By
extending political and diplomatic support to these newly independent
countries, at a time they were particularly weak and vulnerable,
Turkey has helped them integrate with the international community,
join various international and regional organisations and thus,
consolidate their independence and sovereignty. Turkey has also helped
them surmount the grave economic hardships resulting from the
dissolution of highly centralised command economy of erstwhile Soviet
Union, and become self-sufficient, through economic assistance and
grants to the best of her abilities.
Overall
According to the figures of 2005, between 1992 and
2005 (Refer Chart 1 attached)
| (a) |
Turkey has provided $ 1.2 billion in credits
to these countries. |
| (b) |
Turkey's total annual trade with
these countries is approximately $ 2.76 billion. |
| (c) |
More than 2500 Turkish firms operate in the
region. |
| (d) |
Turkish companies have invested more than $ 5
billion in the region excluding construction. |
| (e) |
Turkish companies have realised about $ 14
billion of construction projects. |
Turkey has extended significant military assistance
and training to enable them counter threats to their security and
independence and has not left these countries to their fate, while the
political price for seeking security assistance from other sources
have been high.
Turkey has provided a large scholarship grant to
Central Asian countries. Since 1992, over 21,000 scholarships have
been awarded to students from the region. Of these, over 14,000 were
used (Refer Chart 2 attached). Currently, nearly 3,000 Central Asian
students continue their education in Turkey on these scholarships.
There are 269 Turkish schools in these countries including eight
universities (Refer Chart 3 attached).
The support given by Turkey has not been
pre-conditioned upon the progress in democratisation and market
reform, with the belief that democratic institutions would develop
gradually as stability enhances and restructuring of the states
improve. The support provided by Turkey may seem modest compared to
declared economic aid and grants of western countries. However, it
proved to be precious to the newly independent states of the region as
it has contributed to the creation of a sense of belonging and self
confidence in these countries. Central Asia constitutes a major
priority in Turkish Foreign Policy, adding a new dimension to the
Turkish foreign policy.
Linguistic Ties
Turkish language belongs to Ural Altaic group of
languages, such as Hungarian, Finnish, and Mongolian etc. as distinct
from Indo-European languages. It is an agglunative language where
words can change meaning and grammatical function by addition of
suffixes. Thus, sentences can be formed in one word. The oldest known
agglunative language is Sumerian. It has a similar grammar and some
common words exist between the two languages, which had preserved
their original meaning. For example, the Turkish word in its softened
form in Anatolian Turkish “Tand” is “Dingir” (pronounced “Dingi”) in
Sumerian and it has the same meaning as “God” and it is “Tenir” in
Kyrgyz Turkish. 1 Sumerian
word “Ki” means earth and Turkish word “kisi” means man and the same
word has the same meaning in all Turkish dialects ranging from
Azerbaijani Turkish to Uygur dialect.2
The Turkish language is divided into several
dialects in two groupings: Western and Eastern dialects. There are
scholars that claim these dialects have grown into different
languages. However, given the fact that cadets from Central Asian
countries studying at a Turkish war college can master university
level Turkish in a few months, this argument does not seem to be
sustainable. On the other hand, this approach was espoused by the
erstwhile Soviet regime to drive a wedge between Turkish nations. So
while the name of a dictionary published in 1929 at Baku was
“Russian-Turkish”, in the later editions in line with Stalin’s new
nationalities policy, it became “Russian-Azerbaijani” dictionary. 3
Moreover, changes in pronunciation cannot be construed as a proof of
another language. For example, when you change the “y” sound with a
“c” or a “j” sound, you start understanding another Turkish dialect.
As in the case of yol, yul (road) is jol and col in Kazakh and Kyrgyz
dialects. A dictionary compiled in 1071 by Mahmud of Kasghar covering
7,099 root words and 17,500 entries to teach Arabs the Turkish
language includes all the mutually comprehensible dialects of Turkish
which existed at the time. It can still serve as a guide to the
commonality of the Turkish language. Moreover, 15th-century Timurid
poet Ali Sir Nevai, a strong defender of “Turk Tili” (Turkish
Language) was easily understood by the Turkish speaking intellectuals
from Sinkiang to the Balkans.
Ethnic Ties
Some Turks, mainly Kipchaks, started to settle in
the Caucasus and Balkans earlier, mostly after being employed by some
Asian and Byzantine rulers as mercenaries. 4
However, major Turkish emigration from Central Asia, first to Iran and
further West, started from 8th to 11th centuries. This emigration wave
also spread to other Muslim lands–Iraq and Syria–parallel to Turkish
emigrations to India to establish various states. The battle of the
Malazgirt in the year 1071, where East Roman Emperor Diogenes was
defeated by The Seljuk Emperor Alp Aslan, triggered a turning point in
the final settlement of Turks in the region and particularly Anatolia.
Most of the Turks settled in Anatolia belonged to the 24 tribes of
Oghuz. However, part of these tribes decided to stay in their ancient
homelands.5
Gibbon in his famous book “History of the Decline
and Fall of the Roman Empire” gives ample information about early
Turkish migrations to the West. He refers to “Emigration of the Turks
or Hungarians” 6, “Origin
and Monarchy of the Turks in Asia”7,
their Relations with Romans,8
“Seljuks, who finally settled in the Middle East and Anatolia”.9
However, these population movements continued to and fro throughout
the centuries until the 18th century.
Here, we have to note that ethnicity did not and
does not play a significant role in the foundation of Turkish nation
and tribes. On the contrary, it was customary to adopt the children
born from foreign pregnant women prisoners of war as their own. All
the Turks, who emigrated, mixed with local populations. The only
prerogative of these interactions was that the locals should adopt
Turkish and later Islamic Turkish customs. So Turks are one of the few
nations, whose formation was around a language rather than common
ethnic roots.
Historical Ties
The first common Turkish State universally
accepted, i.e. by all Turks who identify themselves as such at present
time extending from Far East to the Mediterranean, is Göktiirk (Blue
Turk) or Grand Turkish Kaganate. Orhun Valley inscriptions in North
West Mongolia written in original runic Turkish alphabet are also
accepted as the first complete literary texts as apart from grave
stone inscriptions. Since it is customary with the Turks to fight
amongst themselves first, as they saw the other Turk as the most
dangerous adversary and only then unite around the victor and fight
against common enemies, it is hard to find a commonly recognised
historical state after the Göktiirk. One telling example of this
attitude is Timur’s expedition to West to destroy the Ottoman Sultan
Beyazit without intending to occupy Ottoman lands, before turning to
other enemies.
Turkish Policy Towards Central Asian Republics
There was and is still an element of sentimentality
in Turkish approach to Central Asian Republics. As the citizens of the
only Turkish state that was independent for a long time we always felt
an obligation towards our brethren in the East to liberate them from
what we conceived as their “enslavement”. This feeling was strongest
towards Azerbaijan, but we were not less enthusiastic about Turkistan
our motherland. In the end, liberation happened by itself with the
collapse of the Soviet Union. Our sentiments of the day are best
-described by an Italian
journalist with whom a Turkish delegation, which was sent to Central
Asia on a study tour prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union to
sound out about future plans of Central Asian Republics in September
1991, happened to share the same flight from Dushanbe to Askhabad. He
describes the attitude of a member of the Turkish Delegation as such:
“I find his analysis interesting, but still more interesting to me is
the pride and determination with which this Turkish gentleman is
working to give his country a major role in this region that once
belonged to it. I have the impression of a man who feels at home here,
one who is on his way to keep an appointment that has been delayed for
decades, but who is sure that he will still find someone waiting for
him.”10
However, the Government was also very careful not
to antagonise the Soviets (Read Russians) for we had realised it was a
strategic necessity for Turkey to start the second stage of our
relations with a powerful neighbour. From good neighbourly to friendly
relations and with whom we had just signed a treaty, article 16 of
which envisaged “the Soviet state would encourage development of
relations of Turkey with the Soviet Republics”. At the same time,
economic relations were going ahead mainly based on 1984 gas agreement
which stipulated 70 per cent of the payments for the gas bought to be
effectuated through provision of Turkish goods and services. Thus,
Turkish consumer goods were finding their way to the vast Soviet
market and more importantly, Turkish contractors had started to build
in the Soviet Union putting an end to Finnish and Yugoslav cornering
major share of the market.
Turkish Policy Principles
At the time of their independence, we had identified the following
principles for our approach to Central Asian countries.
| (a) |
To contribute to the strengthening of their
independence and sovereignty, particularly by assisting in state
building. In the period 199295, when the world was suspicious
about the sustainability of their independence, Turkey poured in
direct assistance. Turkish International Cooperation Agency was
established with the primary objective of assisting Central
Asian countries. Dozens of seminars and educational programmes
were organised for basic training of civil servants ranging from
customs officers to diplomats. Moreover, army officers started
to receive education and training in Turkish Military Academies
and Institutions. |
| (b) |
To assist these countries to become self
sufficient and to carry out political and economic reforms.
Turkish Exim Bank started doling out substantial credits with
special emphasis on the projects that would help in the
development of their basic industries such as textiles
increasing the value added and thus, reversing the negative
terms of trade to their favour. Again, training programmes were
introduced in finance, fiscal governance, privatisation etc.
Foundation of political parties and their contacts with Turkish
political parties emerged. |
| (c) |
To promote their integration with the outside
world including through membership in international
organisations and providing unhindered direct access to world
markets. They were encouraged to promptly establish diplomatic
ties with other states of the world. Turkish embassies were
instructed to provide them with assistance in establishing these
ties to the extent that at the initial stages some diplomatic
representations of these countries were housed in Turkish
diplomatic missions. Joint efforts were undertaken to make them
members of international organisations. 11
Attempts were made to revive the old Silk Road through promotion
of bilateral and multilateral transport agreements. Particular
emphasis was placed for the export of their hydrocarbons. Plans
were drawn for the pipelines for export of Turkmen gas through
Iran and the Caspian via Azerbaijan to Turkey as well as for
Kazakh oil through Caspian. Plans were laid to build Baku
Tbilisi Kars railway connection to provide direct access to
European railway system through Turkey. |
| (d) |
To develop our bilateral relations in all
fields on the basis of mutual interest and to strengthen our
ties, particularly in the cultural field, Turkish Embassies were
the first to be established in five Central Asian Republics.
Hundreds of bilateral agreements were signed in various fields.
Non-existent trade started to flourish. Efforts towards devising
a common alphabet based on Latin alphabet started. 12
A congress was convened in Baku to this end. Turkish schools
started to operate in these countries. To promote better
understanding amongst them, the first Turkish Speaking Countries
Summit was organised in Istanbul in 1992. |
Achievements
Central Asian States have taken very significant
steps in nation building process as well as in economic development by
opening their countries for foreign investment and diversifying their
commercial relations with various countries besides their traditional
economic ties with Russia.
Turkey’s trade and economic ties with these
countries far outweigh its overall place in the world trade as a
whole. For instance, Turkey is the third investor country in
Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. Turkish companies contribute to the 10 per
cent of GDP of Turkmenistan. 60 per cent of constructions in Astana,
new capital of Kazakhstan, have materialised by the Turkish firms.
Turkey is the third trade partner of Azerbaijan and is among the
primary trade partners of Uzbekistan. The Grand Project of the early
nineties, Baku-Tbilisi- Ceyhan pipeline, has been completed.
Azerbaijani oil flowing through this pipeline will be joined by Kazakh
oil. Another pipeline planned between Samsun to Ceyhan will also carry
additional Central Asian oil to world markets. Furthermore, when
Turkey accelerates its economic development it will be in a better
position to further contribute in diversification and increase of
economic exchanges and intercourse with the region.
Since independence of the Caucasian and Central
Asian countries, more than14,000 students have studied in Turkey.
There are 269 Turkish educational institutions in these countries,
some of which are sponsored by the Turkish government (refer Chart 3
attached). Two Universities, Ahmet Yesevi in Kazakhstan and Manas in
Kyrgyzstan have been built directly by the Turkish Government at a
cost exceeding 100 million US dollars. Most of the annual
administrative expenses of these two institutions are still met by the
Turkish Government. These institutions are well respected. Besides,
many of the military officers of these countries are educated in the
Turkish Military academies or trained by the Turkish officers in their
own countries. In addition, some common cultural monuments including
great Sufi Ahmet Yesevi’s Tomb in Kazakhstan and last grand Seljuk
Emperor Sultan Sancar’s Tomb in Turkmenistan have been restored by
Turkey.
The Process
of Summits of Turkish Speaking Countries
The process of 'Summits of Turkish Speaking
Countries' brings together Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan at the highest level. The next
Summit is to be organised in Antalya, Turkey this fall. The purpose of
the Summit is to facilitate exchange of opinion at the highest level
on major international questions and on matters of multilateral
cooperation. It is not an organisation as such but a consultative
process.
Problems
These nations were used to living under Soviet
umbrella which, while oppressing them also provided protection from
external and internal threats. After independence they were obliged to
cope with the challenges of nation building, new security threats and
sustainable development. Moreover, all these challenges had to be met
and dealt with in an atmosphere of exposure to external influences.
Integration with the rest of the world, which meant participation of
external actors that were alien to the region and who were determined
to impose their way of doing things for accepting new members to the
family of nations of the new world order. In other words, if the East
wanted to meet the West, it had to be on western terms.
Prior to the Russian rule, people used to identify
themselves with their attachment to their families, clans or sometimes
religious faith. The establishment of republics under the Soviet rule
rendered the situation more complex. Artificial boundaries caused
division among local peoples. A policy of “national engineering” was
put into practice.
All Central Asian countries have certain
minorities. Such national minorities cause concern and tension in
intra-regional relations. There are Russians in these Republics,
mostly in Kazakhstan, Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan
and Tajiks in Uzbekistan.
Ethnic mix of former Soviet states and the
tradition inherited from Soviet “Nationalities Policy” which favoured
lesser ethnic groups against larger ones made nation building
difficult and encouraged separatism. Moreover, the discrepancies
between ethnic and political boundaries carried the danger of clashes.
The first response of leadership to these challenges was maintenance
of authoritarian regimes and strengthening of central authority.
Second response was to seek security through regional organisations.
However, new security threats have led them to seek supplementary
remedies. In the immediate aftermath of independence, these countries
embraced the idea of regional integration as a strategy to ensure
development and economic independence and to solve their common social
and environmental problems. However, it soon became clear that
dissimilarities between them outweigh the similarities.
Although countries of the region share the same
geography, a common history and similar cultural traits, they do not -constitute
a monolithic entity. They differ greatly in size of territory,
population, ethnic characteristics, levels of developments, per capita
GDP, defence capability and resource endowment. Present state borders
of these countries are artificially drawn without regard to ethnic
settlements, resulting in a complex topography. The Ferghana valley is
a typical example. In Batken region of Kyrgyzstan for instance, two
enclaves belong to Uzbekistan and one to Tadjikistan, which prevent a
Kyrgyz citizen to travel between major cities of their country without
entering foreign countries. A further example is that in winter one
can travel from Dushanbe to Hojent in Tadjikistan only via Uzbekistan.
Demarcation of state borders is ongoing between
these Republics and causes tensions sometimes. The-unresolved legal
status of Caspian Sea, which is vital for exploitation and
transportation of energy resources, constitutes yet another dispute.
Disputes exist over water and energy resources and mutual dependence
as regards water resources and energy is another source of
instability. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are rich in water resources
while Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan are rich in oil and
natural gas. Uzbekistan is dependent upon Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan
for water supplies, while Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan are dependent upon
Uzbekistan for natural gas. Regional countries don’t hesitate to cut
supplies in case a dispute arises over payments. Distribution of
natural resources, water supplies, transport systems etc. dictate
unhindered economic cooperation amongst these states.
External Actors
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Central
Asia has been exposed to the influence and competition of major powers
due to its geo-strategic location and vast supplies of raw materials,
especially natural gas and oil. It is for the benefit of those
countries to develop relations with all their neighbours as well as
with the leading powers (the USA, Russia, the EU, China, Japan etc.).
Russia’s influence on Central Asia has a long history extending over a
millennium and she has developed close relations of historical,
cultural and geopolitical nature with Central Asian countries. China
is a contiguous neighbour of the Central Asian states. It has a long
border, mostly in Xinjiang (Uyghur Autonomous Regions) with
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan and is influenced by the
developments in the region. China due to her strategic interests in
the region, which includes strengthening security cooperation and
stability, extending economic and trade relations and acquiring energy
resources, is keen on developing cooperation with Central Asian
countries. China and Russia as major economic and military powers,
play a leading role in Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), set up
for enhancing multilateral cooperation in strengthening regional
security. The USA, developed her relations with Central Asian
countries since their independence and the region's priority in the US
foreign policy especially increased after 11 September 2001 incident
and military campaign in Afghanistan. The US strategic aims include
cooperation in fighting terrorism.
As long as
the Central Asian states develop balanced multilateral
relations with their close neighbours and with other countries seeking
cooperation in pursuance of their national interests without allowing
one of the external actors to dominate their policies, their relations
with major powers will yield positive results for their economic
prosperity as well as for regional stability and security.
The Central Asian states have their own political,
socio-economic and cultural characteristics and phases for
development. Therefore, attempts to impose models of political or
economic systems on those countries may have severe destabilising
consequences threatening regional and global security. The Central
Asian countries will pass through their own nation-building processes
moving towards democracy and liberal economy. The external actors
should avoid enforcing models for influencing the political and
economic dynamics in those countries.
Turkey encourages Central Asian countries to
enhance friendly relations with their neighbours as well as other
countries, to expand their multilateral and bilateral relations, and
to play an active role in international organisations. However, the
prosperity of those countries depends primarily on strengthening
cooperation and solving of disputes among themselves. The development
of regional cooperation in Central Asia, is the key for their success.
Prospects In The Region
Central Asia is a large area, roughly twice the
European continent (4 million km 2);
but its population is relatively small (57 million). Geographically,
the region is land-locked, with difficult access routes and it is in a
geo-strategically important location neighbouring Russia, China and
Afghanistan. The Central Asian countries possess vast energy
resources. Turkmenistan has sufficient natural gas reserves which can
be exported by pipelines not only to Russia but also to western
countries. Kazakhstan’s oil reserves are exploited by major
multinational companies and Russia is still one of the major consumers
of Kazakh oil. The agreement to export Kazakh oil via a pipeline
crossing the Caspian sea and reaching the Baku terminal has already
been signed, in order to transport it by Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline
to Europe. In fact, the natural resources of Central Asia are also
sufficient to be exported to the South Asian market. But, a pipeline
from Turkmenistan via Afghanistan and Pakistan to India seems to be a
very risky project taking into consideration the instability and
security threats in Afghanistan. Afghanistan still does not have a
strong central authority and the political system in the country is
very fragile. Taliban is still a major destabilising factor.
With respect to India one has to underline that
India has historical relations and deep roots with the Central Asian
countries. Turkish dynasties that have ruled India and the trade via
the silk route established strong ties between India and Central Asia.
It is without doubt ideal for India and Central Asian states to
exchange technology for natural resources. India as one of the world’s
fastest growing economies is increasingly dependent on imported
energy, whereas Central Asian countries need technology and know how
for their economic development. However, it would be difficult to have
bilateral cooperation due to the regional unfavourable conditions,
emanating mainly from the instability in Afghanistan. On the other
hand, Pakistan would not be a hindrance for India’s cooperation with
Central Asian states. Pakistan has vested interests as a transit route
between India and Central Asia. Therefore, both countries can benefit
from expanding cooperation with Central Asian countries. Moreover,
there is great scope for Indian-Turkish cooperation in the area. The
experience that Turkish firms
have accumulated over the years in the area will greatly contribute to
the success of joint ventures, some of which are already underway.
Religious Extremism
Religious extremism is considered as one of the
major threats to security in Central Asia by some scholars especially
after the rise of “Islamic” terrorism in the last few years. These
fears were based both on the internal dynamics within the Central
Asian Republics and on the influence from the countries situated in
the South and South West of the region.
We cannot talk of any serious religious extremist
threat in Central Asia, perhaps with the exception of Ferghana Valley
of Uzbekistan. The Central Asian governments are all secular and the
leadership is sensitive towards religious extremism. As a matter of
fact, all the people in Central Asia follow the Sunni sect of Islam.
Propaganda could not take any root even in Azerbaijan, a Caucasian
Turkish state where the majority of the population is shi’ite. This is
due to the interpretation of Islamic religion by the Turkish people
which has never been in a fundamentalist manner. Following their
acceptance of Islam in the 9th century, Turks combined their
shamanistic traditions with the Islamic teaching. Therefore, the way
they practice religion does not give any space to fundamentalist
approaches. In Tajikistan, where people speak Dari, the same language
Persian (Farsi) of Iran, the religious extremism could not be
disseminated. Therefore, religious extremism cannot be mentioned as a
challenge to the Central Asian states.
Conclusion
Turkey is a pivotal country in this large area not
only with its geography, but its history and its modern and
progressive mentality as well. Its strategic importance in the area is
not simply a derivative of its geographical location. Its level of
development, its alliances and the relations that encompass political,
economic, military, cultural spheres, it has cultivated in the area
over the years are all components of its strategic value (Turkey is
among the first 20 countries in the world in terms of national
income).
Sentimental element in Turkey’s approach to these
countries makes it a neutral if not benevolent partner to them. Turkey
wishes for their rapid development. Its economic stake in developing
relations with Central Asian countries, although not negligible, is
not of paramount importance. However, their consolidation of
independence, economic development, progress in nation building and
integration with the world remain Turkey's main policy goals. There is
no doubt that the existence of strong, stable states in Central Asia
is an inseparable component of stability -in
the whole Eurasian region.
Turkey encourages Central Asian countries to
cultivate friendly relations with their neighbours. However, we
believe that development of relations, side stepping or solving of
problems that exist, amongst themselves is the most important element
of their stability and economic welfare. They should bear in mind that
Central Asia is a single economic space and reaping the benefits of
their economies is dependent on the degree of cooperation they
achieve.
It is not by accident that the first ever
Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) and
Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) mission
established in Georgia in 1992, was led by a Turkish diplomat and
later two other Turkish diplomats headed the OSCE offices in Tashkent
and Bishkek and North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) Secretary
General’s Special Representative in Afghanistan is presently a former
Turkish Foreign Minister. Turkey strives to bring East and West closer
to each other in every aspect. Although many of these countries are
faced with serious political and economic challenges, there are
promising trends. Especially regional economic cooperation schemes
deserve attention: projects such as revitalisation of the ancient.
Silk Road and the establishment of an East-West Energy and
Transportation Corridor are worth mentioning.
|