Back

Armed Forces and The Changing Value System

Major SS Khara

 

The profession of arms has a high sense of purpose. It calls for certain qualities and characteristics; courage, sense of duty, professional competence, initiative, loyalty, discipline and a sense of urgency. The selection system of the Indian Army lays emphasis on these qualities of leadership. The core values of ethos of the armed forces flow from these considerations. Traditions and regimentation reinforce these and the military tries to ensure that it does not fall below the standard of courage and conduct handed down to it. The military virtues, in a pluralistic society or otherwise, are so called because of their essential connections to the specific military functions. The end (military mission) is essentially fixed - the choice of means to bring about the end often involves moral considerations and always requires a display of certain virtues in effecting these means. In some professions, the most obvious specific virtues are easy to identify; in medicine and law for example, client confidentiality receives unanimous clear, dominant and obvious emphasis. The military virtues are no less obvious - subordination of the good of the self to the good of the nation and the military unit, courage, obedience, loyalty and integrity .The critical things to notice here are that these virtues are obvious because of their functional necessity. Success in battle is impossible without them; preparation for battle requires their inculcation. These moral virtues are not merely “nice to have”, they are functional imperatives in the military profession.

All the great emperors from Ashoka to Akbar and Chandragupta to Shivaji imbibed these values in some form or the other and religiously practiced these. Some of these values are also reflected in the famous words of Field Marshall Earl Chetwode at the Indian Military Academy, Dehradun.
 

The Safety, Honour and Welfare of your country comes
first always and every time
The Honour, Welfare and Comfort of the men you
command comes next
Your own Ease, Comfort and Safety comes last always and
every time.

The military leaders who view the oath as merely a contractual agreement with his government sets the stage for a style of leadership critically different from the leaders who view the oath as his pledge to contribute to the common good of his profession in particular and the society in general. For the former, “duty, honour and country” is a way of life adopted for the good of all and accepted as a moral commitment not subject to contractual negotiation.

The changing socio-economic environment is threatening to take its toll, by gradually distancing the service ethos from its traditional values. We seem to be losing track of the cardinal principle of human philosophy, ‘If you get the value correct, the other things will fall into place.’ Therefore, shaping of values and perception must take precedence, because ethics has a special meaning to the profession of arms; as it calls upon its members to make unreserved supreme sacrifice for the armed forces to ensure that its motivational processes persistently emphasise these values and its style of functioning encourages the development of these values.

The Indian Army has lived with these values and excelled in all fields in the last fifty years. This vindicates the relevance of character values in the present hi-tech army.
 

CHARACTER VALUES IN THE ARMED FORCES

Values can be defined as a habitual characteristic behaviour of the majority in the group based on a set of values and perception or in other words value is an “enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct is personally and socially preferable to the alternative mode of conduct”. Once it is internalised, it becomes consciously or unconsciously a standard of criterion for any guiding action, for developing and maintaining attitudes towards relevant objectives and situations, for justifying one’s own and other’s action and attitudes, for morally judging oneself and others and for comparing oneself with others.

What is the meaning of character? As we know, each individual is a bundle of virtues and weaknesses of the head and heart. The resulting individuality of a person, from this balance sheet of good and bad qualities is his character, which is reflected in his conduct. Hence, it is obvious that a person of character is a person who practices human values, like truth, duty, love, equanimity and non-injury. His thoughts, words and deeds are in harmony. It is for this that a potential officer, when he joins the IMA, Dehradun, is designated as a gentleman cadet. He is expected to be a gentleman in the true sense of the word - a person of character.

On closer scrutiny of the value system, it emerges that there is a certain amount of overlap between some values and in few cases only a hairline distinction exists. Clubbing such values, the following six values would form the core values for the Indian soldier: -
 

(a)

Honour. ‘Honour’ or ‘Izzat’ means to have pride in oneself and in being part of the organisation. For an Indian soldier, ‘Izzat’ stems from izzat for the self, the ‘family izzat’, the ‘gaon’s izzat’ (village’s honour) and extends to the ‘paltans izzat’ (battalion’s honour) and izzat of the nation. It implies that the soldier will even lay down his life for the honour of his unit. Honour as value encompasses the following other values:-

(i)

Truthfulness. Truthful to self, organisation and nation.

(ii)

Physical Courage. Courage to face adversaries. It is the most admired human virtue in all societies; to be a man means to be courageous. This was one of the most important aspects for our success in the 1999 Kargil Operations.

(iii)

Self Esteem. Awareness of one’s worth and endeavour for upholding it under all circumstances.

(iv)

Selflessness. Having little or no concern for oneself especially as regards fame, returns, position and money.

(v)

Fortitude. Courage to withstand pain and adversity.

 

(b)

Honesty and Integrity. The definition of these values is honourable intentions and principles in thought, deed and actions. It demands the highest level of commitment. A soldier’s manifested behaviour as an honest and upright person will be reflected in his actions and thoughts, which should be matching. The capacity for self-denial is most essential for all soldiers, particularly so for the leaders. It is easier said than practiced because of the temptations that are plenty in the environment. However, for a leader who wants to earn the respect of the men he commands, there is no other alternative but to peruse the righteous path and set an example for the subordinates to emulate. Honesty and integrity involves the following: -

(i)

Open and straight forward.

(ii)

Selfless.

(iii)

Capacity of self disciplined.

(iv)

The resultant capacity of self-denial.

 

(c)

Loyalty. Faithfulness to the army’s commitment and cause is defined as loyalty. In other words, loyalty is not to an individual but to the army as an organisation. The ultimate object of loyalty, therefore, is the nation. It implies channelising loyalty in the following three directions: -

(i)

Loyalty to the Chain of Command. It extends ultimately to the nation. It is also implied in the oath taken at the time of commissioning or attestation. It must be understood that loyalty is to the institution and not to the transitory occupier of the chair as a person.

(ii)

Loyalty to the Peers. It implies a readiness to support each other through thick and thin. It manifests itself in an attitude of willing cooperation extended to one’s peers for fulfillment of the organisational goal.

(iii)

Loyalty to the Subordinates. It implies sincere interest in their all round development and concerted effort to ensure that the subordinate’s demands are met.

(iv) There are few other values closely associated with loyalty. These are: -
 
(aa)

Unity. Unity amongst all in the army. 

(ab)

Respect for Authority. Behaviour in accordance with the laid down rules of conduct.

(ac) Justice. Free from prejudice and injustice.
(ad)

Courage of Conviction. To act in accordance with one’s belief, especially inspite of criticism.

(ae)

Altruism. Welfare and care of others, especially of those serving under one.

 

 

(d)

Knowledge. It is defined as the ability to know one’s profession thoroughly and to apply it effectively. Professional knowledge combined with its practical application would induce confidence in the leader. The leader must, therefore, strive to update his knowledge by keeping abreast with the latest developments. It is also of paramount importance to an individual soldier as well. Such knowledge removes the feeling of fear and uncertainty during the fog of war. Today’s soldiers, being thinking men, would like to be involved in activities and do not like to blindly follow orders. He is keen to know the logic of the activity he is asked to take part in and, therefore, it is important that he acquires the knowledge.

(e)

Unity. It implies unity amongst all in the army. It is a feeling of oneness; being together and working together, for a common goal. It may be extended to unity of religious teachings and thought. Unity must transcend the limited boundaries of caste, creed, religion and regions to the nation; to pave the way for (give rise to ) national integration, national spirit and patriotism.

(f)

Courage - Physical and Moral. Courage is the most admired of human virtues in all societies and in all walks of life. To be a man, is to be courageous. Courage is required no less in the higher than in the lower levels of command, but greater the responsibility and higher the rank, the emphasis shifts from physical to moral courage - a real quality, rare but essential to higher command. Physical courage is easy to see and the soldier concerned is rewarded with a medal or an award. However, in the case of moral courage, where the soldier at times has to sacrifice not only his command but also his entire career, and this seldom comes to public notice, and is never awarded a medal. Moral and physical courage are products of character farming process, of the development of self control, self discipline, physical and metal robustness, of knowledge of one’s job and, therefore, of confidence. These qualities minimise fear and maximise sound judgement under pressure. Physical courage is a virtue that makes a man intrepid in the face of danger - this is applicable to all soldiers. Moral courage is the ability to discriminate between right and wrong as also state so unequivocally. Moral courage involves owning up one’s misstate and stand by the subordinates.

 

REASONS FOR CHANGE IN VALUE SYSTEM AND NEED TO REINVIGORATE VALUES


The last 52 years have seen phenomenal technological and sociological changes in the armed forces. The great impact of technology and science has been instrumental in ushering Revolution in Military Affairs, and affecting our life style and expectations. Society is materialistic, bent on the acquisition of money, possessions and status. It is losing touch with nature and regards the military as a necessary evil that is lauded in war and shunned in peace. The present society does not identify itself with the goals and objectives of the government. Our society is selfish, comfort oriented, concerned with personal gratification and personal success. Money is the keystone of our society. It may be argued that this assessment does not reflect our national character which has historically been a peace loving, patient and religion based culture, but this drift towards Mammon, coupled with spiritual pollution and selfish materialism cannot remain insulated from the army.

Effects of such fast changing social environment and development of technology on armed forces personnel are more pronounced in a democracy like ours, than in any other form of government. The attitude and behaviour of our NCOs and OR have undergone perceptible changes, is beyond any doubt. The characteristic of a flexible and vibrant organisation is to identify and to accept these changes in the environment and adopt itself suitably to the requirement. Therefore, before embarking upon discussing the relevance of character values in the modern hi-tech army, it will be pertinent to identify the behavioural pattern and the compulsions of the soldiers: -

(a)

Breakdown of Joint Family System. The long established joint family system has broken down due to various socio-economic factors. The security, which the system used to provide to the soldier by way of attention to the requirements of his family, is thus no longer available to him. Pressing domestic requirements often results in compromising some of the basic character values.

(b)

Materialistic Norms. The older sense of spiritual values is fast changing to yield place to newer sense of materialistic values which are based to an extent on the western values acquired by greater inter course between the advanced and the affluent nations and the developing nations like ours. Mass communication and media like radio, newspapers and television have played an important part. This has resulted in increased material wants and consequent continuous dissatisfaction, which arises out of not being able to “keep up with the Jones”. This, coupled with faster life, greater urbanisation, more permissiveness in society, has resulted in mental stress, which causes psychological disorder.

(c)

Spread of Literacy. With the spread of literacy, the man today has become far more alive and alert to his surroundings, his work, his rights and privileges and he does try to analyse various orders and instructions. Blind obedience to orders is a matter of the past. This in turn has created a situation where a man has not only to be dealt with along physical plane but also along an intellectual plane. It is consequently becoming increasingly difficult to enforce the” old concepts of discipline. There are far too many cases” of questioning orders, instructions and, in general, cases of indiscipline.

(d)

Concept of Welfare State. Being a citizen of a socialistic democratic country, the man One expects a great deal more from the state than before, without realising what does he have to contribute to the state. The hazy concept of “democracy” which does not link responsibility with privileges is undermining the very process of discipline in the army, as it is of the country as a whole.

(e)

Agro Industrial Development. There has been considerable progress in the agricultural and the industrial spheres. This has raised the per capita income of the country. There has consequently been a gravitation of the population available to the rural people from adoption of the more modern methods of farming and agriculture, intake from urban areas has increased and the man joins the army more for the purpose for finding a tentative employment then taking it up as a vocation. This naturally lowers the quality of the material constituting the army.

(f)

Inflation. The wage price spiral is soaring skyward. The country is going through a critical phase in terms of its economy. Shortage of even the essential items has become a routine occurrence. While the man himself is well looked after by ways of ration entitlement, clothing, medical facilities and accommodation, the same can be hardly said for his family. “It is not at all uncommon to see a man’s family and children, undernourished, ill clothed, ill housed and without adequate medical facilities. Domestic problems, therefore, become a source of constant worry.

As is evident from the above factors, soldiers are expected to consecrate themselves to their country, to subordinate their personalities, their rights, their privileges and their opportunities for the good of the nation as a whole. In times of peace they are at material disadvantage. They have to give up the opportunities for gain and prosperity in civil life. They often live in remote places, frequently under trying climatic conditions that affect their health and the health of their families. They work at the cost of (what is dear to everyone -) community interests and associations. They are often socially isolated not from choice but because their economic conditions prevent them from participating in the normal lives of civilians of the same education, character and attainments. Though it is accepted that the military profession is not for any individual who measures success in financial reward, money is the means, to one and all, to discharge his normal responsibilities. Hence there is contradiction between what is ideal in the interest of an organisation vis-a-vis interest of an individual.

In the prevailing dichotomy between the institutional requisites of smooth careerism and the hazards of sticking to traditional values, it is unreasonable to expect the present day soldier to opt for the professionally suicidal course of their rectitude. Exceptions will always be there, however, they do not prove the rule. The stiff competition in the pyramidal hierarchical system encourages short-range zero defect trivia, to make a mark. Human motives for success and recognition impels one’s drive for quick personal gains, even if it is at the cost of abdicating ethical values. Let us discuss in brief the three main disturbing trends, which have crept in the army due to degradation in our value system.

(a)

Careerism. Due to stiff competition in the army, a persons thoughts and actions are marked by opportunism and use of any means, fair or foul, to keep his profile graph favourable for the higher rank, at whatever cost. He does not hesitate to stoop low in the ethics of service to serve his self-interest. He is invariably a tense man, with his mind ever engaged in trying to distinguish himself in petty routine matters, rather than major issues, because he is neither capable of thinking big nor does he have the will to address himself to the longer issues of national or organisational interest. A careerist is an anathema to the interest of man, and he uses his command to serve his personal interests. Seldom does he take a stand for sake of his men. A careerist is a cunning, calculative manipulator who would invariably achieve his goal, by fair or foul means. 

(b)

Sycophancy. Sycophancy is an inseparable element of careerism, as a careerist cannot afford, nor is he inclined to have, a difference of opinion with his master. A sycophant is a sick man of the society, whose mind is always directed to serve personal motive, by ingratiating with his superior officers, through flattery. It is a human craving to be praised or appreciated, which a sycophant exploits by fulfilling this natural craving of his boss, through flattery and one-upmanship. A sycophant surrenders his right of discretion and independent thinking, thus derelicting his obligations to duty and service. A big injustice and wrong are done to the command of sycophant commanders, who is always looking upwards, is subservient to his boss, suspicious of his peers and a terror to his subordinates. The interest of men and the organisation are sacrificed, without a qualm, at the altar of personal interests of the sycophant.

(c)

Zero Error Syndrome. The attitude of expecting perfect results and no error has infected the armed forces. The leaders have to justify their actions at all levels, and small errors are presented as colossal mistakes. A strong protagonist of the ‘no mistake syndrome’ believes in a highly centralised system of working even in petty routine matters, thus curtailing the initiative. In our organisation there are far too many ways record failures and mistakes and hardly any for recording achievements. This creates a sense of insecurity in the command. At the end of the year when the all-important Annual Confidential Report has to be written, ten good deeds might not balance an error.

The degradation of value system breeds un-professionalism and incompetence, firstly, by constraining its members to act in a manner not conducive to professional success and, secondly, by selecting and promoting those whose values are not up to par and personally imperfect. The system induces suppression of intellectual activity, which over a period of disuse, results in atrophy of the thinking capacity. The decaying effect is not only in the intellectual activity. Over the period, tedious monotony of petty routine, and all-body and no mind activity, the higher human sensitivities and vision also gets degraded. Hence, there is an urgent requirement to re-invigorate these military values.
 

Reinvigorating Traditional Values


Presently there is no dedicated organisation to specifically monitor aspects of the military ethics in the services. Nor is there any specifically defined code of conduct or honour code, as in vogue in some other armies. No reform can work unless we address ourselves to the problems at the top. A creation of a cell at Army Headquarters level with the aim of developing and monitoring of service ethos and traditional values in the army may pave a way for giving much-required attention to the most important aspect of military professionalism. Various incidents in the army may be studied from the angle of their influence on higher values so that in the rush of mundane activity the larger and higher aspects of service are not missed out.

The key thrust areas in the traditional values should aim at:-
 

(a) Generating an individual’s pride in him, his organisation and his country, based on the principles of meritocracy and equity of law.
(b)

A working environment where making genuine mistakes is considered a higher and positive asset than avoiding decisions from fear of committing mistakes.

(c)

Eliminating fear and sycophancy amongst all ranks so that they work with dignity, with interest of the organisation and country always supreme.

 

RELEVANCE OF CHARACTER VALUES IN MODERN HI TECH ARMY


Military is the only institution among all walks of life in a society where a leader has to be prepared to lay down his life. More significant than that, he has to motivate men under him to be prepared to do the same. Men will neither risk their lives merely because an officer can flaunt the Army on them or other materia1 inducements. Let there be no doubt that the commercial model cannot be the basis of military leadership when it comes to leading men in war, where the stakes are life or death. Nothing but leadership based on noble values will inspire men. This has been a constant experience though the ages despite the monumental changes in social, economic and political systems.

Change is the essence of life in every sphere and activity, brought about by education; moral and ethical values, advances in science and technology; means of communication and intercommunication; current concepts of religion and ethnicity; and most importantly, the leaders and their personal examples. Political, social and religious leaders are the ones who influence such changes. In a closed society, like the Army, such changes take a longer time to manifest themselves but they cannot be totally avoided. But with the highly structured and hierarchical system of the Army, supported by discipline, such changes can be channelled in the desired direction, if the leaders are of the required calibre. Such channelling is possible if the leaders desire it specifically and take initiative in the matter. The men pick up the attitudes and values of the officers (leaders). They are reflection of their officers. Hence the onus of implementing of character-values lies in the hands of officers. Let us try and identify Three are certain indicators of character values in the Indian Army.
 

(a)

Esprit-De-Corps. The basis on, which esprit-de-corps is promoted within military is quite simple. My unit, regiment, corps, squadron, ship, fleet, formation or whatever, is the best and the noblest; I must do my utmost to ensure that it always stays at the very top; no sacrifice is big enough to uphold its honour and good name. In India, with the culture of joint family system in our very bones, it is not difficult to promote esprit-de-corps. The ethos, in which an individual is prepared to make any sacrifice for the good name and honour of the family, has been with us for centuries. Comradeship and regimental spirit “add up to the familiar esprit-de-corps, an essential element of high morale, a priceless asset, which costs much less than the most up-to-date weapons. But without it, most military hardware is of little value”. An officer as a leader has to make constant efforts to promote this. A very major credit for the exemplary performance of the Indian military, since independence to “Operation Vijay, must go to our pride in our units and formations and esprit de corps - a potent fertiliser for staunchness and high morale. There appears to be very little awareness of the fact that we are perhaps the only army to have successfully been fighting at altitudes above 19000 feet and often going as high as 23000 to 24000 feet above sea level. Our army has proved its worth, equally successfully in the Eastern region where the jungles are impenetrable and rain falls to an awesome 200 inches in six months. Our armed forces have been a conglomeration of castes, creeds, religions, languages, regional strains and even ethnic variations. And yet they have displayed astonishing cohesion and efficiency in fighting wars in insurgencies as much as in maintaining internal security and ameliorating the travails of natural calamities.

(b)

Regimental Spirit. Regimental system provides organisational structure to promote esprit de corps. Richardson in his outstanding work “Fighting Spirit” has brought out with clarity the relevance of this aspect. To quote, “Regimental spirit could be seen at its best in the old Indian military, where in its unique manner it was just as much a religion as in any British Regiment. With them it was also to a considerable extent a tribal effort and, within regiments composed mostly of the same warrior tribes, even sometimes an affair of villages. A young soldier might be related to several of the NCOs or JCOs/WOs in the regiment. He knew that if he did not do well in battle he had not only their displeasure to face but eventually perhaps even the scorn of his whole village”. This tradition is still present in our regimental system and is based essentially on pride in its achievements. Every opportunity is taken to remind the members of these achievements and traditions so that high standards of behaviour, courage and comradeship is set. This is done through the medium of Part II orders, evening roll calls, lectures, unit darbars and the Temple, Mosque, Gurudwara, Church parade gatherings. It is with this repeated treatment that even the “selfish, self centred, rootless men learn to practise unselfishness and find roots and pride in the traditions of a regiment.” Similarly, Battle Honour days remind all ranks of the unit of the achievements and sacrifices of their predecessors. There is nothing better than the study of the regimental history to understand these traditions and inculcate pride in them. A major feature of the regimental system has been to train young officers to “know their men better than their mothers do and care even more.” It requires officers to learn their language, not to eat till their men are fed; excel their men in physical fitness and handling of weapons; become epitomes of military discipline in punctuality, turnout and thoroughness; play games with their men; spend time in their langars; coach them to be the best in all soldierly activities, sports and behaviour; and keep their word. While achieving excellence in their sub units, they are guided by just one ideal, and that is - their performance and that of their regiment. One of the most significant developments is the growing number of sons serving in their father’s regiment.

(c)

Officer-Man Relationship. The cornerstone of the science of war is knowledge of the economy of men’s powers, of their physical possibilities and limitations, of their response to fatigue, hope, fear, success and discouragement, and of the weight of the moral factor in everything they do. Man is a physical being; he will fail utterly in the crisis of battle if there is no respect for his aching back. He is also one of a great brotherhood whose mighty fellowship can make the worst misery tolerable and can provide him undreamed strength and courage. India is a multi religious, multilingual, multiethnic and multi regional society. The composition of the military reflects is diversity. An officer has to command troops who hail from these multiple backgrounds and win their respect and loyalty. Our officers also hail from the same diverse polity. The ongoing counter-insurgency operations and the success in Kargil operations more than demonstrate the cohesiveness, of officers and men. In the annals of warfare, it has often happened that a small and indifferently equipped military has defeated a larger and better-equipped military. This happens when good officers create high morale and esprit de corps among their troops. Good management is the key to these two battle-winning factors.

(d)

Motivation. Combat motivation is a force within a soldier that keeps impelling him to improve his combat performance and commitment to his unit, as an individual and as part of a group. This force motivates an individual, which comes from within him. It is his will and keenness to transcend not only what he sets himself to achieve, without loss of dignity and cherished values. Motivation for combat is the willing decision of a person to place him in a situation that threatens his safety and survival. Even in recent times, our soldiers and leaders have exhibited equally great deeds of valour and sacrifice. The recent Kargil operations have amply proved that high degree of motivation impels the soldier and commanders to give off their best in extremely difficult situations.

The military way is a long hard road, and it demands (makes) extraordinary requirements of every individual. In war, particularly, it puts stress upon men; such that they have not known elsewhere and tempts them to “get out from under”. This would be irresistible if their spirits had not been tempered to the ordeals. So it is the impact of ideals mainly that help men develop the strength to face situations from which it would be normal/ natural to run away. The recent Kargil conflict has brought into focus sterling qualities of leadership displayed by the junior leaders. It, therefore, reinforces the point that whatever be the erosion in values we keep hearing in different forums, the soldier under fire has always made supreme sacrifice for the nation. Unlike the armies elsewhere, Our young officers have always led their troops from the front. In tune with the credo of the IMA, the young officers faced the first bullet.

The Indian Army has proved its mettle beyond doubt in diverse Military operations ranging from conventional wars, counterinsurgency operations to international peacekeeping. The Indian Army has maintained immaculate human rights record in spite of our adversaries’ regular attempts to tarnish our image. This has been possible because the Indian Army stands today on a strong foundation of army ethos and the age-old value system. The majority of soldiers value national security as their most cherished value. This goes to indicate that the feeling of patriotism is very much in existence in the hearts and minds of the soldier in spite of their exposure to materialism and other social changes taking place in the country.
 

Conclusion


In the contemporary social values milieu the greatest challenge for the army is the need to maintain the time tested and trusted military ethos. Traditions of honour, morality, justice and sacrifice take centuries to build up; it will be unfortunate to allow these inherited legacies to degenerate. We need to introspect to evaluate our qualities of self-restraint, humility, impartiality and settling of personal examples while dealing with under command and moral uprightness and professionalism while dealing with the superior echelons. In this regard, a few basic steps that need to be taken are - firstly emphasis on character traits from the days in the academy till the uniform is hung up, secondly, deliberation over the smallest of compromise and ad hoc measures or shortcuts, thirdly, an attitude of delegation rather than restriction and, lastly, recognition of true professionalism rather than peripheral competence.

This is in-house responsibility of the army and it can certainly achieve this proper and judicious steps are taken as called for by the existent condition. The inclination to shrug the blame off to other factors must be given up. Everything is possible with proper training and the right mental attitude. The need is for the development of officers and men who, while being fully conversant with the conventional professional knowledge, are also having an agile mind to “think smart and fight smart to win.” The need is of officers and men with a great degree of initiative, self-esteem and moral courage. At the same time, the nation should also accord the armed forces a place of honour which they richly deserve for their single minded devotion and dedication to make India a strong, vibrant, prosperous and united country.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Major SS Khara is from Int Corps. He is currently Instructor at CIJW School.

                                                                                             Back
 

Copyright © United Service Institution of India
Website By IITPL