 |
|
 |
|
Armed Forces and The Changing Value System
Major SS Khara |
| |
|
The profession of arms has a high sense of purpose.
It calls for certain qualities and characteristics; courage, sense of
duty, professional competence, initiative, loyalty, discipline and a
sense of urgency. The selection system of the Indian Army lays
emphasis on these qualities of leadership. The core values of ethos of
the armed forces flow from these considerations. Traditions and
regimentation reinforce these and the military tries to ensure that it
does not fall below the standard of courage and conduct handed down to
it. The military virtues, in a pluralistic society or otherwise, are
so called because of their essential connections to the specific
military functions. The end (military mission) is essentially fixed -
the choice of means to bring about the end often involves moral
considerations and always requires a display of certain virtues in
effecting these means. In some professions, the most obvious specific
virtues are easy to identify; in medicine and law for example, client
confidentiality receives unanimous clear, dominant and obvious
emphasis. The military virtues are no less obvious - subordination of
the good of the self to the good of the nation and the military unit,
courage, obedience, loyalty and integrity .The critical things to
notice here are that these virtues are obvious because of their
functional necessity. Success in battle is impossible without them;
preparation for battle requires their inculcation. These moral virtues
are not merely “nice to have”, they are functional imperatives in the
military profession.
All the great emperors from Ashoka to Akbar and Chandragupta to
Shivaji imbibed these values in some form or the other and religiously
practiced these. Some of these values are also reflected in the famous
words of Field Marshall Earl Chetwode at the Indian Military Academy,
Dehradun.
|
The Safety, Honour and Welfare of your
country comes
first always and every time
The Honour, Welfare and Comfort of the men you
command comes next
Your own Ease, Comfort and Safety comes last always and
every time. |
The military leaders who view the oath as merely a
contractual agreement with his government sets the stage for a style
of leadership critically different from the leaders who view the oath
as his pledge to contribute to the common good of his profession in
particular and the society in general. For the former, “duty, honour
and country” is a way of life adopted for the good of all and accepted
as a moral commitment not subject to contractual negotiation.
The changing socio-economic environment is threatening to take its
toll, by gradually distancing the service ethos from its traditional
values. We seem to be losing track of the cardinal principle of human
philosophy, ‘If you get the value correct, the other things will fall
into place.’ Therefore, shaping of values and perception must take
precedence, because ethics has a special meaning to the profession of
arms; as it calls upon its members to make unreserved supreme
sacrifice for the armed forces to ensure that its motivational
processes persistently emphasise these values and its style of
functioning encourages the development of these values.
The Indian Army has lived with these values and excelled in all fields
in the last fifty years. This vindicates the relevance of character
values in the present hi-tech army.
| CHARACTER VALUES IN THE ARMED FORCES |
Values can be defined as a habitual characteristic
behaviour of the majority in the group based on a set of values and
perception or in other words value is an “enduring belief that a
specific mode of conduct is personally and socially preferable to the
alternative mode of conduct”. Once it is internalised, it becomes
consciously or unconsciously a standard of criterion for any guiding
action, for developing and maintaining attitudes towards relevant
objectives and situations, for justifying one’s own and other’s action
and attitudes, for morally judging oneself and others and for
comparing oneself with others.
What is the meaning of character? As we know, each individual is a
bundle of virtues and weaknesses of the head and heart. The resulting
individuality of a person, from this balance sheet of good and bad
qualities is his character, which is reflected in his conduct. Hence,
it is obvious that a person of character is a person who practices
human values, like truth, duty, love, equanimity and non-injury. His
thoughts, words and deeds are in harmony. It is for this that a
potential officer, when he joins the IMA, Dehradun, is designated as a
gentleman cadet. He is expected to be a gentleman in the true sense of
the word - a person of character.
On closer scrutiny of the value system, it emerges that there is a
certain amount of overlap between some values and in few cases only a
hairline distinction exists. Clubbing such values, the following six
values would form the core values for the Indian soldier: -
| (a) |
Honour. ‘Honour’ or ‘Izzat’ means to
have pride in oneself and in being part of the organisation. For
an Indian soldier, ‘Izzat’ stems from izzat for the self, the
‘family izzat’, the ‘gaon’s izzat’ (village’s honour) and
extends to the ‘paltans izzat’ (battalion’s honour) and izzat of
the nation. It implies that the soldier will even lay down his
life for the honour of his unit. Honour as value encompasses the
following other values:-
| (i) |
Truthfulness. Truthful to self,
organisation and nation. |
| (ii) |
Physical Courage. Courage to
face adversaries. It is the most admired human virtue in
all societies; to be a man means to be courageous. This
was one of the most important aspects for our success in
the 1999 Kargil Operations. |
| (iii) |
Self Esteem. Awareness of one’s
worth and endeavour for upholding it under all
circumstances. |
| (iv) |
Selflessness. Having little or
no concern for oneself especially as regards fame,
returns, position and money. |
| (v) |
Fortitude. Courage to withstand
pain and adversity. |
|
| (b) |
Honesty and Integrity. The definition
of these values is honourable intentions and principles in
thought, deed and actions. It demands the highest level of
commitment. A soldier’s manifested behaviour as an honest and
upright person will be reflected in his actions and thoughts,
which should be matching. The capacity for self-denial is most
essential for all soldiers, particularly so for the leaders. It
is easier said than practiced because of the temptations that
are plenty in the environment. However, for a leader who wants
to earn the respect of the men he commands, there is no other
alternative but to peruse the righteous path and set an example
for the subordinates to emulate. Honesty and integrity involves
the following: -
|
(i) |
Open and straight forward. |
|
(ii) |
Selfless. |
|
(iii) |
Capacity of self disciplined. |
|
(iv) |
The resultant capacity of self-denial. |
|
| (c) |
Loyalty. Faithfulness to the army’s
commitment and cause is defined as loyalty. In other words,
loyalty is not to an individual but to the army as an
organisation. The ultimate object of loyalty, therefore, is the
nation. It implies channelising loyalty in the following three
directions: -
| (i) |
Loyalty to the Chain of Command.
It extends ultimately to the nation. It is also implied in
the oath taken at the time of commissioning or
attestation. It must be understood that loyalty is to the
institution and not to the transitory occupier of the
chair as a person. |
| (ii) |
Loyalty to the Peers. It implies
a readiness to support each other through thick and thin.
It manifests itself in an attitude of willing cooperation
extended to one’s peers for fulfillment of the
organisational goal. |
| (iii) |
Loyalty to the Subordinates. It
implies sincere interest in their all round development
and concerted effort to ensure that the subordinate’s
demands are met. |
| (iv) |
There are few other values closely
associated with loyalty. These are: -
| (aa) |
Unity. Unity amongst all
in the army. |
| (ab) |
Respect for Authority.
Behaviour in accordance with the laid down rules of
conduct. |
| (ac) |
Justice. Free from prejudice
and injustice. |
| (ad) |
Courage of Conviction. To
act in accordance with one’s belief, especially
inspite of criticism. |
| (ae) |
Altruism. Welfare and care
of others, especially of those serving under one. |
|
|
| (d) |
Knowledge. It is defined as the
ability to know one’s profession thoroughly and to apply it
effectively. Professional knowledge combined with its practical
application would induce confidence in the leader. The leader
must, therefore, strive to update his knowledge by keeping
abreast with the latest developments. It is also of paramount
importance to an individual soldier as well. Such knowledge
removes the feeling of fear and uncertainty during the fog of
war. Today’s soldiers, being thinking men, would like to be
involved in activities and do not like to blindly follow orders.
He is keen to know the logic of the activity he is asked to take
part in and, therefore, it is important that he acquires the
knowledge. |
| (e) |
Unity. It implies unity amongst all in
the army. It is a feeling of oneness; being together and working
together, for a common goal. It may be extended to unity of
religious teachings and thought. Unity must transcend the
limited boundaries of caste, creed, religion and regions to the
nation; to pave the way for (give rise to ) national
integration, national spirit and patriotism. |
| (f) |
Courage - Physical and Moral. Courage
is the most admired of human virtues in all societies and in all
walks of life. To be a man, is to be courageous. Courage is
required no less in the higher than in the lower levels of
command, but greater the responsibility and higher the rank, the
emphasis shifts from physical to moral courage - a real quality,
rare but essential to higher command. Physical courage is easy
to see and the soldier concerned is rewarded with a medal or an
award. However, in the case of moral courage, where the soldier
at times has to sacrifice not only his command but also his
entire career, and this seldom comes to public notice, and is
never awarded a medal. Moral and physical courage are products
of character farming process, of the development of self
control, self discipline, physical and metal robustness, of
knowledge of one’s job and, therefore, of confidence. These
qualities minimise fear and maximise sound judgement under
pressure. Physical courage is a virtue that makes a man intrepid
in the face of danger - this is applicable to all soldiers.
Moral courage is the ability to discriminate between right and
wrong as also state so unequivocally. Moral courage involves
owning up one’s misstate and stand by the subordinates. |
|
|
REASONS FOR CHANGE IN VALUE SYSTEM AND NEED TO
REINVIGORATE VALUES |
|
The last 52 years have seen phenomenal technological and sociological
changes in the armed forces. The great impact of technology and
science has been instrumental in ushering Revolution in Military
Affairs, and affecting our life style and expectations. Society is
materialistic, bent on the acquisition of money, possessions and
status. It is losing touch with nature and regards the military as a
necessary evil that is lauded in war and shunned in peace. The present
society does not identify itself with the goals and objectives of the
government. Our society is selfish, comfort oriented, concerned with
personal gratification and personal success. Money is the keystone of
our society. It may be argued that this assessment does not reflect
our national character which has historically been a peace loving,
patient and religion based culture, but this drift towards Mammon,
coupled with spiritual pollution and selfish materialism cannot remain
insulated from the army.
Effects of such fast changing social environment and development of
technology on armed forces personnel are more pronounced in a
democracy like ours, than in any other form of government. The
attitude and behaviour of our NCOs and OR have undergone perceptible
changes, is beyond any doubt. The characteristic of a flexible and
vibrant organisation is to identify and to accept these changes in the
environment and adopt itself suitably to the requirement. Therefore,
before embarking upon discussing the relevance of character values in
the modern hi-tech army, it will be pertinent to identify the
behavioural pattern and the compulsions of the soldiers: -
| (a) |
Breakdown of Joint Family System. The
long established joint family system has broken down due to
various socio-economic factors. The security, which the system
used to provide to the soldier by way of attention to the
requirements of his family, is thus no longer available to him.
Pressing domestic requirements often results in compromising
some of the basic character values. |
| (b) |
Materialistic Norms. The older sense
of spiritual values is fast changing to yield place to newer
sense of materialistic values which are based to an extent on
the western values acquired by greater inter course between the
advanced and the affluent nations and the developing nations
like ours. Mass communication and media like radio, newspapers
and television have played an important part. This has resulted
in increased material wants and consequent continuous
dissatisfaction, which arises out of not being able to “keep up
with the Jones”. This, coupled with faster life, greater
urbanisation, more permissiveness in society, has resulted in
mental stress, which causes psychological disorder. |
| (c) |
Spread of Literacy. With the spread of
literacy, the man today has become far more alive and alert to
his surroundings, his work, his rights and privileges and he
does try to analyse various orders and instructions. Blind
obedience to orders is a matter of the past. This in turn has
created a situation where a man has not only to be dealt with
along physical plane but also along an intellectual plane. It is
consequently becoming increasingly difficult to enforce the” old
concepts of discipline. There are far too many cases” of
questioning orders, instructions and, in general, cases of
indiscipline. |
| (d) |
Concept of Welfare State. Being a
citizen of a socialistic democratic country, the man One expects
a great deal more from the state than before, without realising
what does he have to contribute to the state. The hazy concept
of “democracy” which does not link responsibility with
privileges is undermining the very process of discipline in the
army, as it is of the country as a whole. |
| (e) |
Agro Industrial Development. There has
been considerable progress in the agricultural and the
industrial spheres. This has raised the per capita income of the
country. There has consequently been a gravitation of the
population available to the rural people from adoption of the
more modern methods of farming and agriculture, intake from
urban areas has increased and the man joins the army more for
the purpose for finding a tentative employment then taking it up
as a vocation. This naturally lowers the quality of the material
constituting the army. |
| (f) |
Inflation. The wage price spiral is
soaring skyward. The country is going through a critical phase
in terms of its economy. Shortage of even the essential items
has become a routine occurrence. While the man himself is well
looked after by ways of ration entitlement, clothing, medical
facilities and accommodation, the same can be hardly said for
his family. “It is not at all uncommon to see a man’s family and
children, undernourished, ill clothed, ill housed and without
adequate medical facilities. Domestic problems, therefore,
become a source of constant worry. |
As is evident from the above factors, soldiers are
expected to consecrate themselves to their country, to subordinate
their personalities, their rights, their privileges and their
opportunities for the good of the nation as a whole. In times of peace
they are at material disadvantage. They have to give up the
opportunities for gain and prosperity in civil life. They often live
in remote places, frequently under trying climatic conditions that
affect their health and the health of their families. They work at the
cost of (what is dear to everyone -) community interests and
associations. They are often socially isolated not from choice but
because their economic conditions prevent them from participating in
the normal lives of civilians of the same education, character and
attainments. Though it is accepted that the military profession is not
for any individual who measures success in financial reward, money is
the means, to one and all, to discharge his normal responsibilities.
Hence there is contradiction between what is ideal in the interest of
an organisation vis-a-vis interest of an individual.
In the prevailing dichotomy between the institutional requisites of
smooth careerism and the hazards of sticking to traditional values, it
is unreasonable to expect the present day soldier to opt for the
professionally suicidal course of their rectitude. Exceptions will
always be there, however, they do not prove the rule. The stiff
competition in the pyramidal hierarchical system encourages
short-range zero defect trivia, to make a mark. Human motives for
success and recognition impels one’s drive for quick personal gains,
even if it is at the cost of abdicating ethical values. Let us discuss
in brief the three main disturbing trends, which have crept in the
army due to degradation in our value system.
| (a) |
Careerism. Due to stiff competition in
the army, a persons thoughts and actions are marked by
opportunism and use of any means, fair or foul, to keep his
profile graph favourable for the higher rank, at whatever cost.
He does not hesitate to stoop low in the ethics of service to
serve his self-interest. He is invariably a tense man, with his
mind ever engaged in trying to distinguish himself in petty
routine matters, rather than major issues, because he is neither
capable of thinking big nor does he have the will to address
himself to the longer issues of national or organisational
interest. A careerist is an anathema to the interest of man, and
he uses his command to serve his personal interests. Seldom does
he take a stand for sake of his men. A careerist is a cunning,
calculative manipulator who would invariably achieve his goal,
by fair or foul means. |
| (b) |
Sycophancy. Sycophancy is an
inseparable element of careerism, as a careerist cannot afford,
nor is he inclined to have, a difference of opinion with his
master. A sycophant is a sick man of the society, whose mind is
always directed to serve personal motive, by ingratiating with
his superior officers, through flattery. It is a human craving
to be praised or appreciated, which a sycophant exploits by
fulfilling this natural craving of his boss, through flattery
and one-upmanship. A sycophant surrenders his right of
discretion and independent thinking, thus derelicting his
obligations to duty and service. A big injustice and wrong are
done to the command of sycophant commanders, who is always
looking upwards, is subservient to his boss, suspicious of his
peers and a terror to his subordinates. The interest of men and
the organisation are sacrificed, without a qualm, at the altar
of personal interests of the sycophant. |
| (c) |
Zero Error Syndrome. The attitude of
expecting perfect results and no error has infected the armed
forces. The leaders have to justify their actions at all levels,
and small errors are presented as colossal mistakes. A strong
protagonist of the ‘no mistake syndrome’ believes in a highly
centralised system of working even in petty routine matters,
thus curtailing the initiative. In our organisation there are
far too many ways record failures and mistakes and hardly any
for recording achievements. This creates a sense of insecurity
in the command. At the end of the year when the all-important
Annual Confidential Report has to be written, ten good deeds
might not balance an error. |
The degradation of value system breeds
un-professionalism and incompetence, firstly, by constraining its
members to act in a manner not conducive to professional success and,
secondly, by selecting and promoting those whose values are not up to
par and personally imperfect. The system induces suppression of
intellectual activity, which over a period of disuse, results in
atrophy of the thinking capacity. The decaying effect is not only in
the intellectual activity. Over the period, tedious monotony of petty
routine, and all-body and no mind activity, the higher human
sensitivities and vision also gets degraded. Hence, there is an urgent
requirement to re-invigorate these military values.
|
|
Reinvigorating Traditional Values |
|
Presently there is no dedicated organisation to specifically monitor
aspects of the military ethics in the services. Nor is there any
specifically defined code of conduct or honour code, as in vogue in
some other armies. No reform can work unless we address ourselves to
the problems at the top. A creation of a cell at Army Headquarters
level with the aim of developing and monitoring of service ethos and
traditional values in the army may pave a way for giving much-required
attention to the most important aspect of military professionalism.
Various incidents in the army may be studied from the angle of their
influence on higher values so that in the rush of mundane activity the
larger and higher aspects of service are not missed out.
The key thrust areas in the traditional values should aim at:-
| (a) |
Generating an individual’s pride in him, his
organisation and his country, based on the principles of
meritocracy and equity of law. |
| (b) |
A working environment where making genuine
mistakes is considered a higher and positive asset than avoiding
decisions from fear of committing mistakes. |
| (c) |
Eliminating fear and sycophancy amongst all
ranks so that they work with dignity, with interest of the
organisation and country always supreme. |
|
|
RELEVANCE OF CHARACTER VALUES IN MODERN HI TECH
ARMY |
|
Military is the only institution among all walks of life in a society
where a leader has to be prepared to lay down his life. More
significant than that, he has to motivate men under him to be prepared
to do the same. Men will neither risk their lives merely because an
officer can flaunt the Army on them or other materia1 inducements. Let
there be no doubt that the commercial model cannot be the basis of
military leadership when it comes to leading men in war, where the
stakes are life or death. Nothing but leadership based on noble values
will inspire men. This has been a constant experience though the ages
despite the monumental changes in social, economic and political
systems.
Change is the essence of life in every sphere and activity, brought
about by education; moral and ethical values, advances in science and
technology; means of communication and intercommunication; current
concepts of religion and ethnicity; and most importantly, the leaders
and their personal examples. Political, social and religious leaders
are the ones who influence such changes. In a closed society, like the
Army, such changes take a longer time to manifest themselves but they
cannot be totally avoided. But with the highly structured and
hierarchical system of the Army, supported by discipline, such changes
can be channelled in the desired direction, if the leaders are of the
required calibre. Such channelling is possible if the leaders desire
it specifically and take initiative in the matter. The men pick up the
attitudes and values of the officers (leaders). They are reflection of
their officers. Hence the onus of implementing of character-values
lies in the hands of officers. Let us try and identify Three are
certain indicators of character values in the Indian Army.
| (a) |
Esprit-De-Corps. The basis on,
which esprit-de-corps is promoted within military is quite
simple. My unit, regiment, corps, squadron, ship, fleet,
formation or whatever, is the best and the noblest; I must do my
utmost to ensure that it always stays at the very top; no
sacrifice is big enough to uphold its honour and good name. In
India, with the culture of joint family system in our very
bones, it is not difficult to promote esprit-de-corps. The
ethos, in which an individual is prepared to make any sacrifice
for the good name and honour of the family, has been with us for
centuries. Comradeship and regimental spirit “add up to the
familiar esprit-de-corps, an essential element of high morale, a
priceless asset, which costs much less than the most up-to-date
weapons. But without it, most military hardware is of little
value”. An officer as a leader has to make constant efforts to
promote this. A very major credit for the exemplary performance
of the Indian military, since independence to “Operation Vijay,
must go to our pride in our units and formations and esprit de
corps - a potent fertiliser for staunchness and high morale.
There appears to be very little awareness of the fact that we
are perhaps the only army to have successfully been fighting at
altitudes above 19000 feet and often going as high as 23000 to
24000 feet above sea level. Our army has proved its worth,
equally successfully in the Eastern region where the jungles are
impenetrable and rain falls to an awesome 200 inches in six
months. Our armed forces have been a conglomeration of castes,
creeds, religions, languages, regional strains and even ethnic
variations. And yet they have displayed astonishing cohesion and
efficiency in fighting wars in insurgencies as much as in
maintaining internal security and ameliorating the travails of
natural calamities. |
| (b) |
Regimental Spirit. Regimental system
provides organisational structure to promote esprit de corps.
Richardson in his outstanding work “Fighting Spirit” has brought
out with clarity the relevance of this aspect. To quote,
“Regimental spirit could be seen at its best in the old Indian
military, where in its unique manner it was just as much a
religion as in any British Regiment. With them it was also to a
considerable extent a tribal effort and, within regiments
composed mostly of the same warrior tribes, even sometimes an
affair of villages. A young soldier might be related to several
of the NCOs or JCOs/WOs in the regiment. He knew that if he did
not do well in battle he had not only their displeasure to face
but eventually perhaps even the scorn of his whole village”.
This tradition is still present in our regimental system and is
based essentially on pride in its achievements. Every
opportunity is taken to remind the members of these achievements
and traditions so that high standards of behaviour, courage and
comradeship is set. This is done through the medium of Part II
orders, evening roll calls, lectures, unit darbars and the
Temple, Mosque, Gurudwara, Church parade gatherings. It is with
this repeated treatment that even the “selfish, self centred,
rootless men learn to practise unselfishness and find roots and
pride in the traditions of a regiment.” Similarly, Battle Honour
days remind all ranks of the unit of the achievements and
sacrifices of their predecessors. There is nothing better than
the study of the regimental history to understand these
traditions and inculcate pride in them. A major feature of the
regimental system has been to train young officers to “know
their men better than their mothers do and care even more.” It
requires officers to learn their language, not to eat till their
men are fed; excel their men in physical fitness and handling of
weapons; become epitomes of military discipline in punctuality,
turnout and thoroughness; play games with their men; spend time
in their langars; coach them to be the best in all soldierly
activities, sports and behaviour; and keep their word. While
achieving excellence in their sub units, they are guided by just
one ideal, and that is - their performance and that of their
regiment. One of the most significant developments is the
growing number of sons serving in their father’s regiment. |
| (c) |
Officer-Man Relationship. The
cornerstone of the science of war is knowledge of the economy of
men’s powers, of their physical possibilities and limitations,
of their response to fatigue, hope, fear, success and
discouragement, and of the weight of the moral factor in
everything they do. Man is a physical being; he will fail
utterly in the crisis of battle if there is no respect for his
aching back. He is also one of a great brotherhood whose mighty
fellowship can make the worst misery tolerable and can provide
him undreamed strength and courage. India is a multi religious,
multilingual, multiethnic and multi regional society. The
composition of the military reflects is diversity. An officer
has to command troops who hail from these multiple backgrounds
and win their respect and loyalty. Our officers also hail from
the same diverse polity. The ongoing counter-insurgency
operations and the success in Kargil operations more than
demonstrate the cohesiveness, of officers and men. In the annals
of warfare, it has often happened that a small and indifferently
equipped military has defeated a larger and better-equipped
military. This happens when good officers create high morale and
esprit de corps among their troops. Good management is the key
to these two battle-winning factors. |
| (d) |
Motivation. Combat motivation is a
force within a soldier that keeps impelling him to improve his
combat performance and commitment to his unit, as an individual
and as part of a group. This force motivates an individual,
which comes from within him. It is his will and keenness to
transcend not only what he sets himself to achieve, without loss
of dignity and cherished values. Motivation for combat is the
willing decision of a person to place him in a situation that
threatens his safety and survival. Even in recent times, our
soldiers and leaders have exhibited equally great deeds of
valour and sacrifice. The recent Kargil operations have amply
proved that high degree of motivation impels the soldier and
commanders to give off their best in extremely difficult
situations. |
The military way is a long hard road, and it
demands (makes) extraordinary requirements of every individual. In
war, particularly, it puts stress upon men; such that they have not
known elsewhere and tempts them to “get out from under”. This would be
irresistible if their spirits had not been tempered to the ordeals. So
it is the impact of ideals mainly that help men develop the strength
to face situations from which it would be normal/ natural to run away.
The recent Kargil conflict has brought into focus sterling qualities
of leadership displayed by the junior leaders. It, therefore,
reinforces the point that whatever be the erosion in values we keep
hearing in different forums, the soldier under fire has always made
supreme sacrifice for the nation. Unlike the armies elsewhere, Our
young officers have always led their troops from the front. In tune
with the credo of the IMA, the young officers faced the first bullet.
The Indian Army has proved its mettle beyond doubt in diverse Military
operations ranging from conventional wars, counterinsurgency
operations to international peacekeeping. The Indian Army has
maintained immaculate human rights record in spite of our adversaries’
regular attempts to tarnish our image. This has been possible because
the Indian Army stands today on a strong foundation of army ethos and
the age-old value system. The majority of soldiers value national
security as their most cherished value. This goes to indicate that the
feeling of patriotism is very much in existence in the hearts and
minds of the soldier in spite of their exposure to materialism and
other social changes taking place in the country.
|
|
Conclusion |
|
In the contemporary social values milieu the greatest challenge for
the army is the need to maintain the time tested and trusted military
ethos. Traditions of honour, morality, justice and sacrifice take
centuries to build up; it will be unfortunate to allow these inherited
legacies to degenerate. We need to introspect to evaluate our
qualities of self-restraint, humility, impartiality and settling of
personal examples while dealing with under command and moral
uprightness and professionalism while dealing with the superior
echelons. In this regard, a few basic steps that need to be taken are
- firstly emphasis on character traits from the days in the academy
till the uniform is hung up, secondly, deliberation over the smallest
of compromise and ad hoc measures or shortcuts, thirdly, an attitude
of delegation rather than restriction and, lastly, recognition of true
professionalism rather than peripheral competence.
This is in-house responsibility of the army and it can certainly
achieve this proper and judicious steps are taken as called for by the
existent condition. The inclination to shrug the blame off to other
factors must be given up. Everything is possible with proper training
and the right mental attitude. The need is for the development of
officers and men who, while being fully conversant with the
conventional professional knowledge, are also having an agile mind to
“think smart and fight smart to win.” The need is of officers and men
with a great degree of initiative, self-esteem and moral courage. At
the same time, the nation should also accord the armed forces a place
of honour which they richly deserve for their single minded devotion
and dedication to make India a strong, vibrant, prosperous and united
country.
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Major SS Khara is from Int Corps. He is currently Instructor at
CIJW School. |

|
|
 |
|